2009 BCS Playoff: Final PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mark Noe   
Monday, 07 December 2009 08:46

The BCS Bowls have been set, and I can't help but be disappointed.  Sure, I'm a proponent of a BCS playoff system, but if I have to eat my lima beans I'd prefer them not to be cold!  The BCS Executive Director said that "the current system works and it has a concensus."  What a load of garbage!  You all have seen the matchups.  Take a look a my 10-team playoff and tell me this wouldn't be more exciting than watching Alabama-Texas, TCU-Boise State, Florida-Cincinnati, Georgia Tech-Iowa, and Oregon-Ohio State.  I can tell you this much... If this playoff produced an undefeated team, they no doubt would be National Champion.

 

Feel free to leave your comments in the forum or email them to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it












 


The Concept:

A hybrid system that incorporates the current bowl system with an expanded playoff. Playoff would take 4 weeks to complete utilizing the same amount of time as the current bowl system.

 

Background:

Anyone even remotely interested in college football knows there is a problem with the current way in which the nation crowns the NCAA football champion. While most major websites and analysts vote for a complete revamp of the BCS system, we believe that the pieces and parts of the solution have already been created waiting for someone to put them together. We have done that and what you see above is the result: A 10 team playoff which incorporates

- BCS Rankings

- Current BCS bowl layout

- BCS Conference Champions with At-Large Bids

- Maintains the tradition of bowl season

We think it is a solid assumption that the current BCS ranking system can identify the top 10 teams in the country, but no amount of human input and computer analysis can pinpoint the top two teams in the nation. It’s this belief that pointed us to a 10 team playoff.

 

Additional Bowl Locations Selection:

The four BCS Bowls (Fiesta, Orange, Sugar, and Rose) are on center stage and the current BCS Bowls plus National Championship format will be maintained. BCS Bowls will have rights to Semi-Final games and 2 of the 4 regional games.

The BCS Bowl which hosts the national championship, will be required to host a regional round game to facilitate preparations for the National Championship.

In order to fill the bracket, the BCS will host a "BCS Playoff Bowl Location Selection Show" where they will invite four non-BCS bowls to participate. These "smaller" bowls will be required to provided their payouts to the BCS payout pot in order to facilitate a graduated payout system which is addressed later.

 

New Bowl Schedule:

After rescheduling, only two bowls (not involved in the playoff) will have to move the date in which they play:

Hawaii Bowl will move from 24 DEC at 8:00pm to 23 DEC at 5:00pm

Emerald Bowl will move from 26 DEC at 8:00pm to 27 DEC at 5:00pm

GMAC Bowl would have the option of moving to 04 JAN at 8:00pm to accommodate a 3 day, bowl game free period before the National Championship

 

Team Selection:

6 BCS Conference Champions seeded 1 through 6 according to their BCS ranking. (AP Rank if too early in the season). If a BCS conference championship does not rank in the BCS rankings they will forfeit their guaranteed bid.

4 Non Conference Champions will be seeded 7-10 and will be required to play into the playoff. These will be the 4 highest ranked teams in the BCS rankings that did not win a BCS conference.

There is no limit to the number of teams any one conference can have in the playoff

Seed assignment is preset and permanent in the bracket. It cannot be altered to make for "better matchups" in the playoff.

 

Payout:

Payout will be graduated and will be determined by the round in which you lose and exit the playoff. A graduated system allows for the increased cost of sending teams to an increased number of games as well as paying for fan incentives to attend.

2009 Payout totals $186,260,000.00

 

Benefits and Drawbacks of the Playoff System:

As with any proposal for change, there must be benefits clearly defined and they must out weigh the drawbacks.

Benefits:

- National Champion will be decided on the field by the players

- Increased viewership of smaller, "early bowl season" bowls

- Increased BCS exposure adding Bowl Location Selection Show

- Current systems remain in place

- Favors BCS conferences while allowing for at-large bids

Drawbacks:

- Lengthened season

Solution: Eliminate weak early season game

- Reduction in number of automatic bowl bids for conferences

Non issue: Payout increased by graduated payout system

 

 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)

Like Us? Share Us.

Add this page to Blinklist Add this page to Del.icoi.us Add this page to Digg Add this page to Facebook Add this page to Furl Add this page to Google Add this page to Ma.Gnolia Add this page to Newsvine Add this page to Reddit Add this page to StumbleUpon Add this page to Technorati Add this page to Yahoo

Campus Login

Sign in with Facebook